<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Terry&#8217;s Computer Tips newsletters June 14th</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.terryscomputertips.com/2009/06/14/terrys-computer-tips-newsletters-june-14th/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.terryscomputertips.com/2009/06/14/terrys-computer-tips-newsletters-june-14th/</link>
	<description>Tips and News for PC Users</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 23:09:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Corrine</title>
		<link>http://blog.terryscomputertips.com/2009/06/14/terrys-computer-tips-newsletters-june-14th/comment-page-1/#comment-12069</link>
		<dc:creator>Corrine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 21:42:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.terryscomputertips.com/?p=1059#comment-12069</guid>
		<description>Re:  SunJava

Hi, Terry.  I thought I would pass along this additional information regarding SunJava for your readers.

Older versions of SunJava (up to JRE 6 update 7) indeed did remain when updates were installed and need to be removed as the older versions of SunJava are highly vulnerable to infection (i.e., Winfixer/Vundo).

With a lot of Microsoft MVP nagging, it took from 2005 until the update late last year to JRE 6 update 10 for Sun Microsystems to get the autoupdater of SunJava to overwrite previous (vulnerable) versions of the program. Updates from JRE 6 Update 10 forward are in a self-contained &quot;jre6&quot; folder that is overwritten if a new JRE is installed.

Even when using the most up-to-date version of SunJava, if older, vulnerable, version(s) are still on the computer, it is vulnerable to infection. Unfortunately, simply using Add/Remove programs to uninstall the old versions is not completely affective. I strongly advise removing old versions of SunJava and agree with Ron&#039;s recommendation to use JavaRa. 

JavaRa will remove the left-overs through JRE 6 update 7 that are missed in an normal uninstall of Java.  (Windows Vista or Windows 7 users need to right-click the JavaRa.exe and Run as Administrator.)

After running JavaRa, the latest version of Java can be downloaded from http://java.sun.com/javase/downloads/index.jsp

Note: UNCHECK any pre-checked toolbar and/or software options presented with the SunJava software. They are not part of the software update and are completely optional.

Regards,

Corrine</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re:  SunJava</p>
<p>Hi, Terry.  I thought I would pass along this additional information regarding SunJava for your readers.</p>
<p>Older versions of SunJava (up to JRE 6 update 7) indeed did remain when updates were installed and need to be removed as the older versions of SunJava are highly vulnerable to infection (i.e., Winfixer/Vundo).</p>
<p>With a lot of Microsoft MVP nagging, it took from 2005 until the update late last year to JRE 6 update 10 for Sun Microsystems to get the autoupdater of SunJava to overwrite previous (vulnerable) versions of the program. Updates from JRE 6 Update 10 forward are in a self-contained &#8220;jre6&#8243; folder that is overwritten if a new JRE is installed.</p>
<p>Even when using the most up-to-date version of SunJava, if older, vulnerable, version(s) are still on the computer, it is vulnerable to infection. Unfortunately, simply using Add/Remove programs to uninstall the old versions is not completely affective. I strongly advise removing old versions of SunJava and agree with Ron&#8217;s recommendation to use JavaRa. </p>
<p>JavaRa will remove the left-overs through JRE 6 update 7 that are missed in an normal uninstall of Java.  (Windows Vista or Windows 7 users need to right-click the JavaRa.exe and Run as Administrator.)</p>
<p>After running JavaRa, the latest version of Java can be downloaded from <a href="http://java.sun.com/javase/downloads/index.jsp" rel="nofollow">http://java.sun.com/javase/downloads/index.jsp</a></p>
<p>Note: UNCHECK any pre-checked toolbar and/or software options presented with the SunJava software. They are not part of the software update and are completely optional.</p>
<p>Regards,</p>
<p>Corrine</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron</title>
		<link>http://blog.terryscomputertips.com/2009/06/14/terrys-computer-tips-newsletters-june-14th/comment-page-1/#comment-12064</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 13:55:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.terryscomputertips.com/?p=1059#comment-12064</guid>
		<description>Regarding the &quot;User Questions About Java&quot;, here&#039;s a pointer to a website/tool to help you cleanup after those Java updates ... JavaRa

http://raproducts.org/javara.html

btw, thanks for your efforts!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding the &#8220;User Questions About Java&#8221;, here&#8217;s a pointer to a website/tool to help you cleanup after those Java updates &#8230; JavaRa</p>
<p><a href="http://raproducts.org/javara.html" rel="nofollow">http://raproducts.org/javara.html</a></p>
<p>btw, thanks for your efforts!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clif</title>
		<link>http://blog.terryscomputertips.com/2009/06/14/terrys-computer-tips-newsletters-june-14th/comment-page-1/#comment-12063</link>
		<dc:creator>Clif</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 06:32:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.terryscomputertips.com/?p=1059#comment-12063</guid>
		<description>Hi Terry, check your spelling in this line:
you have not fixed theh security problem. 

Happens to the best of us.

Now onto the Question ...
Does anyone else hate the idea of multiple versions of Java installed?

Check out JavaRa to ditch those older versions.
http://freewarewiki.com/JavaRa

Don&#039;t even try to remove these manually. I&#039;ve tried and it&#039;s a real headache if not done properly.

Best wishes, Great letter as usual.

Clif
http://freewarewiki.com/NewsLetters</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Terry, check your spelling in this line:<br />
you have not fixed theh security problem. </p>
<p>Happens to the best of us.</p>
<p>Now onto the Question &#8230;<br />
Does anyone else hate the idea of multiple versions of Java installed?</p>
<p>Check out JavaRa to ditch those older versions.<br />
<a href="http://freewarewiki.com/JavaRa" rel="nofollow">http://freewarewiki.com/JavaRa</a></p>
<p>Don&#8217;t even try to remove these manually. I&#8217;ve tried and it&#8217;s a real headache if not done properly.</p>
<p>Best wishes, Great letter as usual.</p>
<p>Clif<br />
<a href="http://freewarewiki.com/NewsLetters" rel="nofollow">http://freewarewiki.com/NewsLetters</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://blog.terryscomputertips.com/2009/06/14/terrys-computer-tips-newsletters-june-14th/comment-page-1/#comment-12062</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2009 21:57:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.terryscomputertips.com/?p=1059#comment-12062</guid>
		<description>Re. digitising vinyl. I have done this extensively in the past, both with records and tapes, and earned the &quot;been there, done that&quot; T-shirt. I would juat like to add my two penn&#039;orth. (It&#039;s just as good as two cents&#039; worth, being British!). I use the ubiquitous Audacity for my recordings and I could probably write a whole article on that alone, having played around with just about every available &quot;effect&quot; and tool in the program. If the end result is to be like a commercial CD, i.e. with all the tracks topped and tailed and track markers in the right places, the process is really rather laborious. I have yet to find any software that can accurately put automatic track markers in the right places 100% of the time, most being fooled by fade-ins, fade-outs, quiet beginnings, etc. Also if tracks need extensive &quot;cleaning&quot; (de-clicking, equalising, etc.), that can also take a great deal of time. I find that most of the automated functions are easily beaten by good old-fashioned hard graft, using all the toys and tools that are available in Audacity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re. digitising vinyl. I have done this extensively in the past, both with records and tapes, and earned the &#8220;been there, done that&#8221; T-shirt. I would juat like to add my two penn&#8217;orth. (It&#8217;s just as good as two cents&#8217; worth, being British!). I use the ubiquitous Audacity for my recordings and I could probably write a whole article on that alone, having played around with just about every available &#8220;effect&#8221; and tool in the program. If the end result is to be like a commercial CD, i.e. with all the tracks topped and tailed and track markers in the right places, the process is really rather laborious. I have yet to find any software that can accurately put automatic track markers in the right places 100% of the time, most being fooled by fade-ins, fade-outs, quiet beginnings, etc. Also if tracks need extensive &#8220;cleaning&#8221; (de-clicking, equalising, etc.), that can also take a great deal of time. I find that most of the automated functions are easily beaten by good old-fashioned hard graft, using all the toys and tools that are available in Audacity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
