<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 10 things you should know about Internet Explorer 7 Security</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.terryscomputertips.com/2006/10/31/10-things-you-should-know-about-internet-explorer-7-security/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.terryscomputertips.com/2006/10/31/10-things-you-should-know-about-internet-explorer-7-security/</link>
	<description>Tips and News for PC Users</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 23:09:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: terry</title>
		<link>http://blog.terryscomputertips.com/2006/10/31/10-things-you-should-know-about-internet-explorer-7-security/comment-page-1/#comment-23</link>
		<dc:creator>terry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2006 17:34:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.terryscomputertips.com/2006/10/31/10-things-you-should-know-about-internet-explorer-7-security/#comment-23</guid>
		<description>I consider the Active-X autoblocking an upgrade just like I consider WinXP SP1&#039;s change to turn on the XP Firewall by default, instead of defaulting to off, an upgrade.  Most people will run it out of the box without tweaking a thing.

Will it give the same endless string...?  Maybe.  MS put in a pre-defined list of Active-X apps/controls that will be allowed to run automatically.  Others will ask permission.
Terry</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I consider the Active-X autoblocking an upgrade just like I consider WinXP SP1&#8217;s change to turn on the XP Firewall by default, instead of defaulting to off, an upgrade.  Most people will run it out of the box without tweaking a thing.</p>
<p>Will it give the same endless string&#8230;?  Maybe.  MS put in a pre-defined list of Active-X apps/controls that will be allowed to run automatically.  Others will ask permission.<br />
Terry</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DanH</title>
		<link>http://blog.terryscomputertips.com/2006/10/31/10-things-you-should-know-about-internet-explorer-7-security/comment-page-1/#comment-21</link>
		<dc:creator>DanH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2006 15:58:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.terryscomputertips.com/2006/10/31/10-things-you-should-know-about-internet-explorer-7-security/#comment-21</guid>
		<description>Setting IE6 run/script active x controls options to prompt or disable produces endless IE windows asking to allow. This is on safe sites like MSN.com!!

Why is the IE7 active x autoblocking an upgrade when anyone can do the same with IE6? And will it produce the same endless string of popup permission requests? 

New subscriber here, nice newsletter. Maxthon/Opera user. Daniel H.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Setting IE6 run/script active x controls options to prompt or disable produces endless IE windows asking to allow. This is on safe sites like MSN.com!!</p>
<p>Why is the IE7 active x autoblocking an upgrade when anyone can do the same with IE6? And will it produce the same endless string of popup permission requests? </p>
<p>New subscriber here, nice newsletter. Maxthon/Opera user. Daniel H.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
